Hayden Library Entrance
What are the intended
functions of the place?
To enter into the underground library, a place to sit and
rest in the courtyard, and enjoy something from the Café.
What overt messages
does the place send (i.e., openly communicated through signs)?
It’s a place of study and knowledge. Café Bibliotecha means cafe library or
something to do with books. I saw a sign listing the hours of the library and a
sign saying to not smoke within 25 ft of the entrance.
What covert messages
does the place send (i.e., hidden messages)?
There’s only one way in, and one way out.
Have previous users
left traces behind in the place?
I didn’t see any signs of littering—which is surprising.
Some ash is in the ashtrays but nothing else. Cardboard boxes sat near the
café’s rear entrance because the café workers were restocking their inventory.
Has the place been
re-appropriated (i.e., beyond its original functions)?
Obviously the entrance was installed after the library was
built. It looks more 90s and the fact of a café being there lets me know it was
added during a time when cafes became popular and synonymous with books.
What social or
cultural customs did you observe (i.e., rules governing appropriate behavior)?
Groups of friends talked to each other on the stairs. It was
a busy environment, but people found time to socialize between classes.
Sometimes people ran into familiar faces on the steps and chatted right then
and there; people had to walk around them. Some people held doors open for people; I saw
a lot of students making an effort to do this. Nobody skateboarded because
there were stairs. I didn’t see anyone use the elevator because disabled people
should use it. Smokers smoked EVERYWHERE.
25 feet doesn’t make a difference when you’re in a giant underground concrete
square with not a lot of ventilation.
Who has access to the
place? Are there insiders and outsiders?
Inside and outside kind of fuses here. You go from outside/ASU, walk downstairs to an
enclosed courtyard, then walk through the doors of the library.
Who owns the place?
Arizona State University
What is the place’s
value (i.e., monetary or otherwise)?
A critical aid in study and intellect. Studying simply
revolves around using resources.
Are there official
representations of the place (i.e., online, in promotional materials)? Do they accurately capture the place as you
experienced it?
My parking pass has a picture of it, but it’s only showing
the entrance—and shielding the fact that it’s underground.
Is the place in
transition, a changing place?
I don’t see any remodeling taking place.
What conflicts or
tensions are there in the place?
People who were late for class seemed frustrated at the fact
they were late. I saw boredom on the faces of the people standing in the café
line.
What is the place’s
history? Do you see evidence of the past
there in the present?
There are some architectural and design representations of
Arizona: through the Santa Fe style metal beams, terra-cotta paint, teal blue color on the ceiling, and
smooth concrete exterior. It’s not a typical ‘library’ building of wood
molding, bricks and iron work, it has an Arizona feel.
How does this place
differentiate itself from other places?
What other places is it similar to, but how is it different from those places?
I’d say that every ASU building is completely unique in
every way. There aren’t a lot of
buildings on the ASU campus that look like each other. I think this was done on
purpose to create a special ‘place’ for certain majors and to separate
interests from each other.
What questions do you
have about your place?
Why did they decide to have part of the library underground?
Do people really not know about smoking laws? Was the underground entrance
added later?
Key Features /
Profiles (taken from the Norton Field Guide (Goggin and Bullock) Chapter 16,
pages 165-166)
An interesting
subject. What is unusual about your place?
Alternatively, is there something ordinary about it that you can show in
an intriguing way? Not a lot of libraries
have underground entrances. And the
entrance looks very different than the library building next to it. The building is white and very 1970s, and the
entrance is underground, desert-themed, and looks like it was constructed in
the 90s.
Any necessary
background. What background information will you need to include about the place in
order to situate readers? This is the only way to get in and out of the
Hayden Library building.
An interesting
angle. Rather than trying to tell
readers everything about the place, what angle(s) might you use? It’s a
very busy place and people either ignore others, keep to themselves, or block
out the world through music or electronics.
A firsthand
account. Did you interact with people in the place or
participate in some way? What
experiences did you have there that you can write about using “I”? (Yes, first person point of view is
encouraged, especially for this paper.) I asked the girl working at the café
what music was playing and she didn’t have a clue and didn’t really understand why
I was asking. Not a people person, for
sure. The point of this paper is to highlight the fact that people only
interact with others if they’re comfortable with them, or out of pure
necessity.
Engaging details. What specific information must you include in
your description of the place? What
potential does your place have for the use of sensory images, figurative
language, dialogue, anecdotes, and showing rather than telling? What do you want the dominant impression to
be?
I took a lot of notes about the building design and the way
the rain fell. I used figurative language and sensory images. I don’t think
they transferred well to my rough draft.
The only dialogue was found in the café. People didn’t like to speak
outside of that environment.
I want the impression of my analysis to be slightly scientific,
yet engaging and documentarian.
Generating Ideas and
Text (taken from the Norton Field Guide (Goggin and Bullock) Chapter 16, pages
168-169)
Explore what you
already know about your subject. Why
do you find this place interesting? What
did you already know about it? People walk through these doors every day
and I can tell a lot of them don’t think much about it or try to analyze it.
If you’re planning
to interview someone, prepare questions. What
would you like to ask someone in the place in order to better understand it?
When was the last time you talked to somebody in the Hayden
Library Entrance? What do you usually do
when you arrive? What time do you usually arrive? Do you come here often? How does
an underground setting influence your studies?
Do additional
research. Does your place have an online component? How else might you gather additional
research? There’s a website to search for books in the library but other
than that, it’s not very helpful.
Analyze your
findings. What patterns, images, or recurring ideas or phrases did you use to
describe your place? What contrasts or
discrepancies do you see? I focused a lot on the people walking in an out
of the doors. They were a constant presence and there was always something new
to notice as I sat there for an hour. When I analyzed the second time, I saw
that people were more open to congregating with friends. But they still didn’t
talk to strangers unless it was necessary.
Come up with an
angle. What is most memorable about your subject? What most interests you? What will interest your audience? I liked
that the Hayden Library changed when it was rainy. It wasn’t the same place as
it was when the sun was shining. When it was rainy, it caused me to reflect
more, slow down, and realize that I wasn’t going anywhere for the time being
(unless I wanted to get drenched.) I
might as well just be ‘in the moment.’
When it was sunny, I tried to do this, but there wasn’t anything out of
the ordinary to fix my eyes upon. There
was a harsh glare from the sun, and about 6 people smoking, so I sat in the café
and looked out the window because my lungs hurt. I didn’t feel ‘involved’ as I had when I sat
outside.
No comments:
Post a Comment